http://aging.wiki/w/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Review_on_26096690Review on 26096690 - Revision history2026-05-17T10:56:12ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.39.1http://aging.wiki/w/index.php?title=Review_on_26096690&diff=149&oldid=prevAdmin: 1 revision imported2024-06-07T01:05:12Z<p>1 revision imported</p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 01:05, 7 June 2024</td>
</tr>
<!-- diff cache key schw90_wiki:diff::1.12:old-148:rev-149 -->
</table>Adminhttp://aging.wiki/w/index.php?title=Review_on_26096690&diff=148&oldid=prevAdmin: 10 revisions imported2023-02-03T18:23:34Z<p>10 revisions imported</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>This is review page for https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26096690/<br />
<br />
En.wiki seems to misinterprete this article concluding that ''"with his protocol the grafted heads survived up to six months.[1]"'' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head_transplant#History Their [1] refers to review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27738901/ which says ''"Over half of his mice survived for periods longer than 24 h, with the longest survival being 6 months [22]"'' where [22] refers to https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26096690/ <small>(btw, "over half of mice survived longer than 24 h" is also false).</small><br />
<br />
<br/>However the only very brief mention of "6 months" in https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26096690/ is the following phrase in Discussion: ''"This work was undertaken to provide a model in which immune rejection and brain function can be assessed over time, by prolonging the survival period of the donor and recipient for up to 6 months."''<br />
This is likely about aim, not about achievements.<br />
<br />
There is no statistics of mice survival in the paper. There are no videos of functioning of that supposedly long-lived mice.<br />
The article has been cited only 29 times during 7 years.<br />
<br />
It's even less believable considering the phrase from the paper: ''"Forty Kunming mice and forty C57 wild-type mice underwent the head transplant procedure. After allograft, 12 pairs of mice survived over 24 h <...> Within 1.5–2 h after transplantation, the both mice regained consciousness, displaying activity function and responsiveness"''.<br />
<br />
If there really was a mice which lived for whole 6 months after transplantation there would have been numerous details on that, much more citations and interviews.</div>Admin